Is client data used to train your models?
Absolutely not. We deploy isolated instances for each firm. Your data remains within your private cloud environment and is never used to train our base models or accessible to other clients.
Parse thousands of case files in seconds. Identify precedents with algorithmic precision. The Renaissance of legal efficiency is here.
Generates first-draft motions and briefs citing relevant case law in your jurisdiction, formatted to court standards.
Upload millions of documents. Our semantic engine finds contradictions and smoking guns that keyword search misses.
AI that understands attorney-client privilege. Automatically flags and redacts sensitive communications before production.
Can Latvian police search a mobile device on the street? On what legal basis?
ECLI.ai summary: Police may access a person’s mobile device only in circumstances defined by law; a spontaneous “on the street” review of phone contents is not allowed without a legal basis. Usually the basis is a criminal proceeding, a procedural action (inspection or search) and an accompanying decision; exceptions are extremely narrow.
- Article 96 of the Constitution protects privacy and communications secrecy; any interference must be lawful, pursue a legitimate aim, and be proportionate.
- A mobile device becomes an investigative object only within criminal procedure and under the Code of Criminal Procedure rules on inspections or searches.
- Routine street checks have no basis; emergency powers are narrow and subject to later judicial oversight.
Article 96 and the Constitutional Court decision in case No. 2009‑10‑01 require the three-step test (legal basis, legitimate aim, proportionality) before interfering with a personal device 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
Section 159 treats an inspection as an investigative action; the Supreme Court upheld a phone inspection conducted in line with the procedural safeguards 44%ECLI:LV:AT:2017:0411.
Searches typically require an investigating judge’s decision, and the courts stress that such measures are lawful only when grounded in the Code and a specific ruling 86%ECLI:LV:AT:2017:0411.
Without a criminal process and a procedural order, police cannot review phone contents; doing so would breach Article 96 and amount to unjustified interference 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
In emergencies investigators may act immediately, but judicial control must follow; broad “on the street” searches remain impermissible 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
Bottom line: police may access a phone only within a criminal proceeding, executing the Code’s investigative actions and respecting the proportionality requirements of Article 96.
Can Latvian police search a mobile device on the street? On what legal basis?
ECLI.ai summary: Police may access a person’s mobile device only in circumstances defined by law; a spontaneous “on the street” review of phone contents is not allowed without a legal basis. Usually the basis is a criminal proceeding, a procedural action (inspection or search) and an accompanying decision; exceptions are extremely narrow.
- Article 96 of the Constitution protects privacy and communications secrecy; any interference must be lawful, pursue a legitimate aim, and be proportionate.
- A mobile device becomes an investigative object only within criminal procedure and under the Code of Criminal Procedure rules on inspections or searches.
- Routine street checks have no basis; emergency powers are narrow and subject to later judicial oversight.
Article 96 and the Constitutional Court decision in case No. 2009‑10‑01 require the three-step test (legal basis, legitimate aim, proportionality) before interfering with a personal device 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
Section 159 treats an inspection as an investigative action; the Supreme Court upheld a phone inspection conducted in line with the procedural safeguards 44%ECLI:LV:AT:2017:0411.
Searches typically require an investigating judge’s decision, and the courts stress that such measures are lawful only when grounded in the Code and a specific ruling 86%ECLI:LV:AT:2017:0411.
Without a criminal process and a procedural order, police cannot review phone contents; doing so would breach Article 96 and amount to unjustified interference 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
In emergencies investigators may act immediately, but judicial control must follow; broad “on the street” searches remain impermissible 86%ECLI:LV:ST:2009:1018.
Bottom line: police may access a phone only within a criminal proceeding, executing the Code’s investigative actions and respecting the proportionality requirements of Article 96.
What is the latest ABLV bank scandal?
Summary: the “latest ABLV scandal” in case law refers to criminal proceedings after the forced liquidation where individuals tried to exploit the ABLV story for fraud/extortion, rather than new wrongdoing by the bank’s management.
- An individual posed as a holder of “secret proof” about the liquidation and demanded payment from a shareholder.
- The court found the evidence was fabricated and the criminal intent remained unfinished.
- This is a standalone criminal episode, not a fresh international scandal originating from ABLV.
A 2019–2023 criminal case showed a person tried to get money from an ABLV shareholder by promising fake audio/video materials about the forced liquidation 92%ECLI:LV:AT:2023:0524.
Because the funds were never handed over, the intent remained unfinished; the court treated it as an attempt at fraud/extortion.
An anonymized ruling explains how the ABLV brand was leveraged to make others believe in “secret evidence,” even though it never existed 86%Anonimizēts_nolemums_75228222.pdf.
The court stressed that ABLV served only as a backdrop for deception, not as proof of renewed misconduct by the bank.
This episode differs from the 2018 international crisis—it is a criminal side-effect where the ABLV name was misused for manipulation 86%ECLI:LV:AT:2023:0524.
If the query targets shareholder liability, FCMC/ECB decisions, or sanctions, ECLI.ai can pull additional rulings.
Use ECLI.ai's artificial intelligence models to find court precedents, applicable laws, and quickly discover potential solutions.
Instant access to court decisions and legal acts from various institutions.
Access a file search system that goes deeper than keywords and ECLI numbers.
Built-in PDF viewer highlights key paragraphs, shows summaries with key data, lets you copy citations and download the full document.
Join the 400+ firms modernizing their practice with ECLI.ai.
No credit card required for pilot program
Absolutely not. We deploy isolated instances for each firm. Your data remains within your private cloud environment and is never used to train our base models or accessible to other clients.
Yes. We have native bi-directional integrations with all major legal practice management and e-discovery platforms, ensuring a seamless workflow without data duplication.
Our hallucinations rate is less than 0.01%, significantly lower than the industry standard. Every citation is hyperlinked to the original source text for instant human verification.